2006-11-30

Tribute to Canada

This is a good read - funny how it took someone in England to put it into words...
-RK
So much of it so true, and yet my favorite line is the one about Celine Dion.
-RW

Sunday Telegraph Article
From today's UK wires: Salute to a brave and modest nation
Kevin Myers, The Sunday Telegraph

LONDON - Until the deaths last week of four Canadian soldiers accidentally killed by a U.S. warplane in Afghanistan, probably almost no one outside their home country had been aware that Canadian troops were deployed in the region. And as always, Canada will now bury its dead, just as the rest of the world as always will forget its sacrifice, just as it always forgets nearly everything Canada ever does.
It seems that Canada's historic mission is to come to the selfless aid both of its friends and of complete strangers, and then, once the crisis is over, to be well and truly ignored. Canada is the perpetual wallflower that stands on the edge of the hall, waiting for someone to come and ask her for a dance. A fire breaks out, she risks life and limb to rescue her fellow dance-goers, and suffers serious injuries. But when the hall is repaired and the dancing resumes, there is Canada, the wallflower still, while those she once helped glamorously cavort across the floor, blithely neglecting her yet again.

That is the price Canada pays for sharing the North American continent with the United States, and for being a selfless friend of Britain in two global conflicts. For much of the 20th century, Canada was torn in two different directions: It seemed to be a part of the old world, yet had an address in the new one, and that divided identity ensured that it never fully got the gratitude it deserved.

Yet its purely voluntary contribution to the cause of freedom in two world wars was perhaps the greatest of any democracy. Almost 10% of Canada's entire population of seven million people served in the armed forces during the First World War, and nearly 60,000 died. The great Allied victories of 1918 were spearheaded by Canadian troops, perhaps the most capable soldiers in the entire British order of battle.

Canada was repaid for its enormous sacrifice by downright neglect, its unique contribution to victory being absorbed into the popular Memory as somehow or other the work of the "British." The Second World War provided a re-run. The Canadian navy began the war with a half dozen vessels, and ended up policing nearly half of the Atlantic against U-boat attack. More than 120 Canadian warships participated in the Normandy landings, during which 15,000 Canadian soldiers went ashore on D-Day alone. Canada finished the war with the third-largest navy and the fourth-largest air force in the world.
The world thanked Canada with the same sublime indifference as it had the previous time. Canadian participation in the war was acknowledged in film only if it was necessary to give an American actor a part in a campaign in which the United States had clearly not participated - a touching scrupulousness which, of ourse, Hollywood has since abandoned, as it has any notion of a separate Canadian identity.
So it is a general rule that actors and filmmakers arriving in Hollywood keep their nationality - unless, that is, they are Canadian. Thus Mary Pickford, Walter Huston, Donald Sutherland, Michael J. Fox, William Shatner, Norman Jewison, David Cronenberg, Alex Trebek, Art Linkletter and Dan Aykroyd have in the popular perception become American, and Christopher Plummer, British. It is as if, in the very act of becoming famous, a Canadian ceases to be Canadian, unless she is Margaret Atwood, who is as unshakably Canadian as a moose, or Celine Dion, for whom Canada has proved quite unable to find any takers.
Moreover, Canada is every bit as querulously alert to the achievements of its sons and daughters as the rest of the world is completely unaware of them. The Canadians proudly say of themselves - and are unheard by anyone else - that 1% of the world's population has provided 10% of the world's peacekeeping forces. Canadian soldiers in the past half century have been the greatest peacekeepers on Earth - in 39 missions on UN mandates, and six on non-UN peacekeeping duties, from Vietnam to East Timor, from Sinai to Bosnia.
Yet the only foreign engagement that has entered the popular on-Canadian imagination was the sorry affair in Somalia, in which out-of-control paratroopers murdered two Somali infiltrators. Their regiment was then disbanded in disgrace - a uniquely Canadian act of self-abasement for which, naturally, the Canadians received no international credit.
So who today in the United States knows about the stoic and selfless friendship its northern neighbour has given it in Afghanistan? Rather like Cyrano de Bergerac, Canada repeatedly does honourable things for honourable motives, but instead of being thanked for it, it remains something of a figure of fun.

It is the Canadian way, for which Canadians should be proud, yet such honour comes at a high cost. Recently four more grieving Canadian families knew that cost all too tragically well.

**** ****

2006-11-29

Imagine

Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today...

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace...

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world...

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

  • JOHN LENNON
  • 2006-11-28

    municipal democracy at it's (ahem) finest

    I love it when a municipal government gets legacy ideas in its head that go against the interest of the locals (and common practical sense), even if there are 42,000 of them against it.

    2006-11-27

    Inaugural visit

    Isn't it a little presumptuous of harper to attend another country's presidential inauguration?
    Notice / Avis
    From the Prime Minister's Web Site
    Public events for December 1st, 2006
    November 24, 2006, Ottawa, Ontario

    Prime Minister Stephen Harper will travel to Mexico to attend the inauguration of President-Elect, Felipe Calderon.
    When: December 1, 2006
    Where: Mexico City, Mexico
    Note: Media are welcome to attend but will have to make their own arrangements. More details to follow.
    It just seems to smack of favoritism and meddling with another country's choices. I don't know, maybe it's the custom, but I just don't find it appropriate for him to pay an international visit to another head of state until he's had a chance to form a comfy ass-groove in his presidential chair, you know?

    2006-11-26

    this ain't no "all you can eat"

    It would seem that a 33% raise over 10 years isn't enough for the association/federation/whatever representing Quebec's 8000 specialist doctors who are refusing to negotiate and are applying pressure tactics until the ministry gives them a 44% pay increase to "catch up to the Canadian average."

    Kudos both to the increasingly exasperated Quebec Minister of Health for telling them "This [our society] is not a buffet where you can pick what you like and skip what you don't like." Kudos also to the team at Radio-Canada (french CBC) for using and reusing this truthful soundbite in their lead-up to the news segment.

    Hopefully enough of these specialist doctors will get the message so that they go back to work and get people off their waiting lists so everybody can get back on with their lives as happy productive citizens, respectful of one another.

    (increasingly aware)2

    Four things I very much appreciated on tonight's Tout le monde en parle:
    1. There are still many people committed to protecting the natural heritage of Mount Orford Park (a parcel of which is being sold by the Quebec government to build condos);
    2. There will be a single, common, mandatory course on all the world's major religions scheduled to replace catechism and other such religion-of-belonging courses, and the Quebec minister of Education was able to strongly refute the suggestion that any teaching on religion be eliminated altogether from the curriculum until CEGEP, saying that education, awareness, and understanding are fundamental enablers for integration and social harmony;
    3. At least one of the GG's literary award recipients has a beautiful way with spoken words, not just written, and that such talent is well recognized and rewarded (doubly pleasing in that it also reflects well upon the institution awarding the prize); and
    4. There is a song "Dégénération" (play on words with des générations) that speaks about how people today seem to be shirking their responsibilities (even toward their own kids) and taking it easy on the backs of all our ancestors who worked so hard to provide for their families and communities, and that this song is currently on the top of the pop charts in Quebec.

    These are the kinds of things that make me proud - and it's lot deeper than any feeling of vindication or validation - I'm glad to see there are so many people (with actual talent) investing themselves in fighting injustice and promoting what they too know deep down is the right thing.

    2006-11-23

    Nation building defining exercise

    I think part of the confusion and resistance to the motion tabled that recognizes the Quebecois as a nation within a united Canada stems from the different meanings the word "nation" has in English and in French. Most anglos would define it in terms of a country (in the historical and geographical sense), whereas the Quebecois understand it to mean "a self-empowered people with a common destiny." I suspect these radically different views originated in the French Revolution, when the people of France disposed of their aristocracy. Meanwhile, the English continued to peck away at their own aristocracy crumb by crumb, never wholly confident that they could do without. If that is at least partially true, it could explain the very close relationship Quebeckers have with their government while English Canada continues to mistrust and work in spite of it. If that were at least partially true, Quebec should recognize that it is not that distinct from certain other provinces!

    PS. Note he distinct(ahem)ly referred to the people (the Québecois) as a nation, not the province!

    2006-11-21

    the reality some people call TV

    I wonder how much snow it takes to not sprain your ankle when jumping out of a plane...

    -----Original Message-----
    FW: Ottawa on Days of Our Lives.. Portrayed as wilderness...according to Sandy Sharkey

    I’ve never been a soap opera fan, but I have been hooked on ‘Days of Our Lives’ this week. Why? Because the city of Ottawa has been part of the plot line! Here’s this week’s ‘Days of Our Lives’ Ottawa story-line, and I am not embellishing in any way: a woman by the name of Kayla was exposed to poison gas in a hospital, and the only doctor with the serum to save her life lives in Ottawa, BUT WAIT, there’s a huge blizzard in the lower provinces of Canada, so all commercial planes have been grounded, including all planes in Ottawa, which of course is located in the lower provinces of Canada. So a pilot named John volunteers to fly his private jet to Ottawa to get the serum to save Kayla’s life, snow storm or not!!! Away he goes, with his girlfriend Marlena along for the ride, flying through the blizzard until, ENGINE FAILURE!!! The plane is going down!!!! Marlena thinks that the plane will be OK if the load is lightened, so she JUMPS from the plane on the way to Ottawa, and lands on the snow somewhere near Ottawa!! A distraught John the pilot continues on, lands safely in Ottawa, and gets the serum! Meanwhile, his girlfriend Marlena is lost in the wilds of Ottawa!! Back home, Marlena’s daughter is horrified that her mother is missing! How can her mother survive the ‘THIRTY FEET OF SNOW and temperatures below zero’, she exclaims!! John the pilot flies back home with the serum, saves Kayla’s life, but still no sign of Marlena. As luck would have it, a man in a big parka stumbles across an unconscious Marlena in thirty feet of snow in the wilds around Ottawa, and takes her back to his cabin!! Marlena awakes, make-up and hair perfect! As luck would have it, the man in the parka is none other than ‘Smokey Robinson’! One of Marlena’s favourite singers! He gives her food, bandages up her sprained ankle (after all, she did jump from a plane) and then he sings a couple of songs! Saved by Smokey Robinson, who happens to have a cabin in the wild near Ottawa! Wow. ‘Days of Our Lives’ just became my favourite show of all time.

    fighting for peace abroad...

    One of the very real dangers of "exporting peace" is that it actually generates conflict at home.

    The state has, in order to control us, introduced division into our thinking, so that we come to distrust others and look to the state for protection.
    ~Butler Shaffer
    The seeds of ill-will sown in war all too often trump any hope for peace.

    2006-11-20

    new mayor in town

    In an article by Spencer Callaghan, The News-EMC (one of the local papers), mayor-elect Larry O'Brien was quoted as saying:
    I think the city has a huge appetite for change and they wanted to get away from the politics of the same old, same old, and I think they saw in me someone who is focused on bringing a business-like approach to the management of city affairs.
    That appears rather disrespectful toward the outgoing mayor, and awfully presumptuous toward the runner-up, who campaigned actively and hard to make this a greener, nicer, more effective city, with tax increases at or below inflation. (O'Brien, at the opposite end of the spectrum, touted zero tax increases for his entire mandate, while adding more police officers on the streets and without cutting services...)
    We have to get back to basics in the city, we have to get the decision making right and we have to get the economic sustainability of this city right, and then we can afford the luxury of examining what our options are in mass transit.
    As if we really needed yet another politician who believes mass transit is a "luxury" that should be sacrificed in favour of "economic sustainability."

    What saddens me further is that he garnered 47% of the vote, while the runner-up only got 36%; the consolation prize being that this was one of the highest voter turnouts in recent history.

    I just hope there is enough influence among all the incumbent city councillors to actually do the right things for our city, not just say the right things for his new political career.

    From the Desk of Steven MacKinnon

    in a newsletter dated 10 Nov 06:
    In London North Centre, popular food bank director and firefighter, Glen Pearson is already running a strong campaign -- While the Conservative Party has parachuted a candidate into the riding (From Washington D.C. where she worked as a Republican strategist), Glen lives and works in the city. [...] When accepting the nomination, Glen made reference to his Conservative opponent who was dispatched by Stephen Harper from Washington D.C. by saying, “Mr. Harper was brazen enough to bring up an operative from Washington. This isn't Bush Lite, this is Bush Regular, or Bush on tap."
    Could this possibly be true? Why haven't I heard any noise about this?

    dealing with waste at the source

    http://www.cyberpresse.ca/article/20061119/CPSOLEIL/61119124/5803/CPSOLEIL

    « Nos comportements de consommation favorisent le grand nombre de déchets que l'on produit. Il faudrait s'en préoccuper », dit Manon Lambert, secrétaire générale de l'Ordre des pharmaciens du Québec.

    I couldn't agree more.

    residential energy efficiency

    I just got my house audited for energy efficiency.
    It is "surprisingly airtight for a home of its age (32years) in this neighborhood."
    There were a few obvious air leaks (around attic hatches) and some surprising air leaks (like through the electical outlets and between the quarter-round and the floor below the patio door). Despite these easily addressed leaks, total air leakage is only the equivalent of a single 150sq.in. opening. Below 100sq.in is considered too airtight, and if you don't have a Heat-Recovery Ventilator, Health Canada recommends running bathroom fans and opening windows, even in winter.
    I'll be getting an EnerGuide rating for the house and access to an online summary that I can project new ratings after various home improvements. Pretty neat stuff. People usually put their EnerGuide ratings in their furnace room but I think I'll be posting it on my lawn to spur a little competition with the neighbors. :)

    No.1 on the energy-efficiency hit list: FURNACE
    Currently have mid-efficiency (approx 80%), while high-efficiency furnaces are rated at 94%.
    New furnaces are also direct-vented so they don't require a fresh air intake (obvious source of air-leakage).

    Number 2 on the hit list: HOT WATER TANK.
    Tanks with a pilot light have a constant flow of air to the chimney, actually drawing a lot of heat out of the water when the burner is not on! Better tanks have electronic ignition and exhaust blowers so air doesn't flow through the core unless the burner is on. This could also be direct-vented so the fresh-air intake could be eliminated altogether.

    Cherry picking: weather-stripping the attic hatches and using childproof plugs to cap all the outlets on the outside walls.

    Other interesting things I learned:

    • 76% of all energy consumption in a house is due to heating, while appliances and lighting only account for 12% each (in the average home, according to StatsCan).
    • Adding plastic wrap over windows only increases the R value from R2 to R3, iff installed properly, and can improve air-tightness (again, iff installed properly).
    • Changing exterior doors only improves overall energy efficiency by ~1%.
    • Refinishing hardwood floors also does a great job of sealing them and the baseboards.
    • Gas hot water heaters are approx 65% efficient when operating, but only approx 50% efficient overall since cool air flows steadily through the core the rest of the time, drawing the heat out.
    • Furnace efficiency is rated at steady-state, and there is a lot of energy lost when the burners first come on. For this reason, dual-stage furnaces are more efficient since they only use half the burners, at peak efficiency, for much longer periods of time, and only fire up the other two when it can't keep up.
    • Traditional AC blower motors (forced air systems) consume approx 250W while their DC equivalent only consume 75W. This can make a significant difference especially if the blower operates continuously all day long.

    I asked tons of questions throughout, and he wasn't afraid to tell me like it is (unlike house inspectors who fear any liability). I highly recommend doing this audit before starting any home improvements!

    2006-11-17

    wealth

    Warren Buffet reportedly said that "wealth is the transfer of money from the impatient to the patient."

    I prefer to think that wealth is the transfer of money from the stupid and optimistic to the scrupleless and the lucky.

    Note: by "luck" I refer to the association of the entire set of conditions that one did not create for him/herself, such as inherited fortune or empire (corporate or otherwise), and having had fertile conditions (timing, location and connections) to cultivate one's ideas, because dedication, perseverance and effort alone are not reliable indicators of success.

    2006-11-16

    RE: Patriot Act

    The following are some of my favorite anti-war quotes (the original list goes on and on):
    Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.
      ~George Washington
    Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
      ~Benjamin Franklin
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
      ~Voltaire
    It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so...
      ~Robert A. Heinlein
    Violence as a way of gaining power...is being camouflaged under the guise of tradition, national honor [and] national security...
      ~Alfred Adler
    Our enemies...never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
      ~George W. Bush
        talk about irony
    The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.
      ~Frank Kent
        I've often said I believe we deserve better but have no one to blame but ourselves!
    The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home.
      ~James Madison
    The state has, in order to control us, introduced division into our thinking, so that we come to distrust others and look to the state for protection.
      ~Butler Shaffer
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.
      ~James Madison
        wow - how appropriate and timely is that?

    You'd think that we'd eventually learn to listen, rather than shut out?

    2006-11-14

    ignorance is bliss

    That is my public transit realization of the day. This is why:
    I'm standing in the middle of the bus. There are a few people standing sparsely behind me, blissfully unaware of all the passengers packed so tightly at the front of the bus that they are probably concerned for their lives should the doors and/or windshield of the bus fail.
    The people at the back are too short and cannot see the predicament of the people at the front. They are happy in their ignorance. The people at the front (including the driver) do not know there is lots of room in the back and assume the people at the back are just as crowded so don't say anything, despite being uncomfortable (at least they were able to squeeze on board unlike the others that got left behind). I am the only one NOT happy, because I can see the solution and feel compelled to intervene, but choose not to because I'm clearly not an authority figure and how dare I tell them what they should do, least of all because they feel they have to defend their now obviously wrong choice?

    So in the end, what is the right thing to do: Stand by quietly, enjoying my anonymity, while others suffer unnecessarily due to the actions (and inactions) of others, or should I ask the comfortable few at the back to snuggle up and risk disturbing their happy little views of the world?

    The assumed/experienced perspectives from all three of the above subjects (front, back and observer) indicates to me that ignorance IS bliss, trying to intervene is often too much trouble, and not intervening leaves a residue of guilt. I think you need to be either shortsighted/blind so as not to have to think about these things, or sufficiently thickskinned that you do not worry about stepping on others' toes.
    Unfortunately I am neither.

    2006-11-10

    government action against drug-impaired driving

    I'm very pleased with today's announcement (well, their official position anyway) against drug-impaired driving.
    One of the nice things about not being ideologically driven is that I get to agree with things the Conservatives are doing that actually are good for the country.

    action against drug-impaired driving

    I'm very pleased with today's announcement (well, their official position anyway) against drug-impaired driving.
    That's one of the nice things about not being ideologically driven: I get to agree with things the Conservatives are doing that actually are good for the country.

    2006-11-09

    FW: grace

    Change can be good, especially when it comes with a strong vision and an authoritative platform to implement it.
    Here is a little tribute to Grace Hopper, coiner of the computer "bug" phrase:
    http://www.hopper.navy.mil/grace/grace.htm

    2006-11-07

    priority ranking heuristics

    Had to address the misconception that I have "complicated rules" for prioritizing things, because the only priority system being applied by the trustee was "guessing and doing whatever he usually complains about most." That clearly wasn't effective nor to anyone's satisfaction.
    So, I tried to explain there aren't any "complicated priority lists" or guessing required; rather, I have a basic approach that assesses the following variables:
  • severity (of consequences and level of effort or inconvenience required to undo or repair)
  • probably of occurrence
  • safety/degree of urgency
  • with consideration for the following:
  • effort involved (quick fixes or "low hanging fruit")
  • if it's not something you don't feel like doing (converse does not apply)
  • and
  • a healthy dose of "while you're at it" (which regularly trumps the law of diminishing returns)
  • That's not overly complicated, is it? Effectively delegating this kind of decision-making seems a whole lot harder (without making the other person feel I think they're wrong).
    Anyway, part of me (the part that is being assimilated by the work-environment bureaucracy and becoming paranoid) feels that by explaining these heuristics, I am effectively identifying the kinds of excuses that I will usually accept, but I think the expected tradeoff in predictability should be to everyone's advantage.

    2006-11-02

    memory jogger: CSR

    Found this section of the Wikipedia article on Common Sense Revolution (CSR) particularly interesting:
    The central foci of the CSR were tax reduction, balancing the budget, reducing the size and role of government, and an emphasis on individual economic responsibility (often summarized by an opposition to government "hand-outs"). Among other things Harris promised to reduce personal income tax rates by 30% and balance the provincial budget at the same time (which had reached a record $10 Billion deficit under the NDP).
    The CSR was specifically tailored as a reform document. It was presented as a radical change to the status quo of provincial government business, which was widely seen to be poorly managed and inefficient. Indeed, the opening words of the document were "The people of Ontario have a message for their politicians -- government isn't working anymore. The system is broken."
    Hmmm... why does that sound familiar?

    blogger = journalism?

    This story is going to be interesting: Blogger On Trial
    particularly if and how the media chooses to portray this incident and its outcome, because they may perceive bloggers as a threat to their established rights and priviledges...